🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that may create several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a district court's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its decision was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision comes amid a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House figure said the court had yet again damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.